Sunday, May 30, 2010

The Golden Grizzlies Fan: Part I

Going along with an earlier theme, this is the first part of three in a series of posts about what it is to be a Golden Grizzlies fan. This one examines "fanhood" from a broad level; the second part will be about maturing from a student to an alumni and how that affects being a fan; and the third will look at the holy grail of college basketball fanaticism: rushing the court.

The way we become fans of sports teams and programs has always fascinated me. It is appropriate to say that most of us enter fandom either by location or socialization, or in most cases a combination of both. For instance, every household in the State of Michigan has chosen a side in the Michigan-Michigan State debate. Typically, location isn't as much a factor as family history in deciding whether one has loyalty to the Wolverines or the Spartans. On the flipside of the debate, many Michiganders are loyal to one of the sorriest franchises ever, that of the Detroit Lions. Because the Lions organization has been so bad for so long, I would argue much of our state's fanaticism stems from location. The NFL is the nation's most popular sport, so it would make sense that an overwhelming amount of people would desire a team to call their own that is actually near to them.

In the past, I've pondered the idea of an Oakland Golden Grizzlies fan being created more out of circumstance rather than by socialization or location. Because the Division I era (and by extension, the Golden Grizzlies moniker) is still relatively young, the program hasn't had the time to see young kids grow up to be lifelong Grizzlies. This process is likely happening now as early-DI-era graduates settle down, begin families, and bring them along to games. Similarly, Oakland University is still considered a local university. So as far as location goes, the program may draw in some fans from the county it derives its name from, but it still has a way to go before ALL of Michigan starts pulling for it.

The best part about the results of this analysis is that the program is clearly heading in the direction where socialization and location will begin to make more of a difference. But for the immediate past, present, and future, OU fans are born out of the circumstances of their educational choice. In essence, fans here are those associated with OU because of something other than sports. Not a revolutionary idea, I know, and one probably true of most mid-majors around the country. Programs like Oakland may never pull in the random person from Northville or Williamston or Evart with no connection to the university, especially without football. But that fact, I think, is what makes Golden Grizzlies pride very special.

The fanaticism here is born out of time spent as a student, staff member, administrator, or "friend" of the university. Save a few rare individuals, OU pride is something that grows over time, sometimes four years, sometimes a decade. It may take something like an NCAA Tournament appearance or a player with NBA potential to push someone from casual observer to an in-tune fanatic. Whatever the case, the opportunities for people to realize the specialness of the program are becoming increasingly ripe as Coach Greg Kampe and Co. have found the consistency on which to grow a winning program.

There is no "right" way to becoming a fan. Any organization would love just to have fans to help fill the seats come game-time. That said, certain college programs have it made easy in this department through a combination of socialization, location, and plain ol' time. OU hasn't had these luxuries and so it must do what it can (free student tickets, special in-game promotions, unique advertising) to build a fanbase out of those easiest to target: associates of the university. The hope is that the payoff comes in the future with a generation of game-goers who embrace the tradition they were a part of building.

-

I didn't want to break up the flow of the above essay, so I thought it best to tack on a note here at the end: I'd be curious to see some comments on how you found your way to the OU family of fans. None of these essays are ever to be taken as the absolute truth; I simply enjoy putting my hypothesis out there and testing it in written form, so I'm sure a few readers have become fans in slightly different ways. Definitely leave a comment if you feel so inclined. And thank you for reading.

Thursday, May 13, 2010

The State of the Program: Part III

The following is the third and final part in a series about the state of the Oakland University basketball program. So often such addresses are delivered by the heads of state (or in this case, the program), but for today this is from the perspective of an outsider, a dedicated fan.

Being a sports fan is inherently about community. We express our fanaticism for our favorite teams by wearing clothes, attending games, joining forums, reading analysis and recaps, and - in some cases - writing about the experience ourselves. All of these things connect us to other supporters of the team. The shared interest flows from one fan to the other, it spurs conversation, and ultimately makes us happier individuals.


For college basketball, a strong community of supporters is absolutely essential in developing a happy program. When fans don school colors, the school wins from increased exposure. When fans attend games, it helps bring in much-needed revenue. When fans talk about the games and read the recaps, it makes it possible for a local paper to support a beat writer who in turn exposes the program to wider audiences. And when all of these combine, the program can do wonders not just for itself, but for the stature of the university as a whole, too.

Fortunately, at Oakland University all of these facets have been coming together nicely over the past few seasons. University apparel has been made available at nearby supermarkets, and local businesses have slowly embraced the university's swag. Students, while never lacking the opportunity to obtain a free shirt at OU, still have a tendency to wear gear from other universities, but progress has been made at games and especially while in the student section. Black-outs have become the norm for students at big games, evidenced at last season's homecoming game against Oral Roberts.

Attendance figures as a whole have been great the past few seasons. The average attendance was steady in the mid-2000s before surging in the 2008-2009 season due to two games at the Palace of Auburn Hills that were counted as home games despite a larger crowd advantage for the visiting teams (Michigan and Michigan State). Still, the increase that season was good enough for second largest increase in the nation, and the opportunity to play home games at the Palace should not be discounted. This past season saw the largest growth sans a Palace game. Average attendance was 2,733, no doubt boosted by increasing student participation as well as community interest in a team that eventually won a conference championship and NCAA tournament bid. The sense of community emanating from the O'Rena is surely something to behold and a strong indicator of the program's current success.

This community sense has also been enhanced by technology. While he's yet to join the Twitter revolution like conference colleague Scott Nagy, Coach Greg Kampe gave fans insight into the team's preparation before every game on OUGrizzlies.com via video updates. For a team that does not receive regular attention on national or regional media outlets, such updates have been key in giving fans the inside scoop so many other schools have the privilege of receiving. Furthermore, the Oakland Press has been instrumental in giving access to fans through the efforts of beat reporter Paul Kampe and Doug Pemberton before him. They have found success in adapting with the times by offering a weekly video interview series known as Grizz Talk on their website. Credit should also be given to the student newspaper which has gracefully fulfilled its role of updating students on news and events regarding the program. Finally, fans have also been involved through a forum that features many dedicated supporters who discuss, analyze, and link to anything going on with the program. All great programs have such outlets for fan expression, and the Grizzlies community has come together to offer one of the best in the conference.

The commitment from administrators, students, alumni, and community members to Golden Grizzlies basketball has been growing over the years. Many will say that 2010's NCAA Tournament appearance was validation that the commitment and emotional investment was worth it. After all, OU was featured on the front pages of the Detroit News and Free Press and on FOX 2, WDIV 4, and Channel 7 throughout the days leading up to the game against Pittsburgh. There were also stories and breakdowns on any number of the national college basketball websites and blogs in cyberspace. And there was a buzz amongst fans on-campus, especially as 100 students boarded buses to attend the NCAA game in Milwaukee where the students, combined with family members, alumni, and other fans, made for a formidable OU support section. It was clearly a good time to be a Grizzly this past March, and the positive effects of that experience should continue to be seen in the future.

---

It is my hope that after reading these last few posts about The State of the Golden Grizzlies basketball that a light was given to some aspects of the program that are sometimes overlooked. I'd never want to bypass the impact that Coach Greg Kampe and the coaching staff, athletics staff, senior administrators, and donors make on the program. But the recent success the program has had in broadcasting, graduation rates, and community-building are paramount to this process as well. As a recent graduate, it is my hope that the OU program will continue on this exciting path which has brought the university more exposure in the local area, the state, and the nation. Most of all, it is hoped that the special community that has grown out of this basketball program can continue to be a rewarding and positive one which fosters more traditions, more friendships, and more everlasting memories.

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

The State of the Program: Part II

The following is the second part in a series about the state of the Oakland University basketball program. So often such addresses are delivered by the heads of state (or in this case, the program), but for today this is from the perspective of an outsider, a dedicated fan.

When the average person attends college, the goal is to obtain a degree. It is presumed that the degree will be valuable in the search for a meaningful and fulfilling job. In the realm of college basketball, however, it is debatable whether this is the true end goal. In the one-and-done era, especially, it has become increasingly common for student-athletes to completely bypass the former portion of that hyphenated word which press conference moderators love so much. These individuals are students only in the sense they are enrolled in classes. But how much time and effort is put into those classes? A recent report showed that such effort is minimal for the University of Kentucky basketball team, which featured four one-and-doners this past season, where the team GPA was just above passing.

The one-and-done phenomenon doesn't affect teams at the mid-major level as much, but there are still factions on such campuses who wonder about the work athletes put into school versus sport. As an Honors student and dedicated supporter of athletics during my time at OU, this was something I thought about on a consistent basis. The Honors student in me valued education first and foremost, but the basketball fan in me knew the athletes were denied certain opportunities I would have because they played Division I basketball. A major part of my time as an undergrad was shaped outside of the classroom by the activities I was involve in, the many communities I joined, and the jobs and internships I was able to partake in. In essence, I had a complete undergraduate experience.

While I'm sure any basketball player will tell you they too had a great experience, there is no doubt that the time they have to dedicate to the program severely limits opportunities: if you have practice during the day, it becomes difficult to secure an on-campus job; if you have summer workout programs, it's nearly impossible to land a summer internship; and if 75% of your non-conference schedule is on the road, well, it is really hard to establish meaningful relationships with professors. These are all things I had the opportunity to do as Joe College Student, and each one of them made me feel more connected to the university, boosted my pride, and eventually led me to spend a lot of time trying to spread that pride and sense of community to others.

The basketball program does that too, and the players are perhaps the most integral part of that process. They sacrifice the typical college experience for grueling practices, long flights, and even longer bus rides to lackluster places like Macomb, Illinois. Don't get me wrong, there are assuredly many perks that make the life manageable; these are gifted individuals with talents better than most who go to school for "free" (and no one is saying they don't have chances to have fun off the court), but it is still worth noting such sacrifices that many students often forget about when debating the merits of the student-athlete education.

What is important noting at Oakland University, as we evaluate the State of the Program, is that the student-athletes are graduating. While it is impossible to show what is behind the degrees they are earning, the simple fact remains that they are getting them. They are walking across the stage each semester with a degree in hand. Three starters from last year's team just graduated in May, making Coach Greg Kampe three-for-three for both his 2006 freshmen class (Johnathon Jones, Keith Benson, and John Kast) and amongst those who stayed with the program in his 2005 freshmen class (Derick Nelson, Erik Kangas, and Ricky Bieszki). Even as one of those players, Keith Benson, tested the NBA waters early (and eventually withdrew), he still had his degree in hand.

We can be sure that after four (or five) years under Kampe, these individuals are graduating as disciplined men. They are proven winners. Some may go overseas to play basketball for a bit while others may stay in the States seeking playing opportunities. But ultimately they'll end up in a position where their Oakland University degrees (and experiences therein) will come in handy. This fact is something all Golden Grizzlies fans should be proud of because there are not many schools that can boast about graduation rates. And it's also one more reason why it is a remarkable time to be a supporter of this program.

Monday, May 10, 2010

The State of the Program: Part I

The following is the first part in what hopes to become a series about the state of the Oakland University basketball program. So often such addresses are deliver by the heads of state (or in this case, the program), but for today this is from the perspective of an outsider, a dedicated fan.

When we talk about teams, we remember spectacular seasons and the players who made those moments possibles. When we as fans make an emotional investment in a championship season, we obtain a sort of immortality; we were a part of something bigger than ourselves, something that will live on in our memories and those of our children and grandchildren when passed on.

But when we talk about programs, we remember the institutions: the coaches. Coaches transcend the lifespan of players, and the truly amazing achieve their own immortality, not only in the minds of fans who were there for the ride, but for an entire society. We often forget, though, that there are others who achieve such standing, the ones who dictate what the coaches put on the court or field: the broadcasters.

In Michigan there is no broadcaster who has attained ever-lasting life like Ernie Harwell. He called games when fans had no choice but to tune in over their transistor radios. He called the good seasons and the bad ones. He was an institution within the Detroit Tigers baseball club. And the reverence with which people remember him in Michigan and around the nation surely cements his legendary status amongst society at large.

---

On the same night Harwell was remembered at Comerica Park, a new generation of broadcasters - Mario Impemba and Rod Allen - spent an inning talking Harwell with the legend's long-time partner, Paul Carey. Impemba was visibly excited about the opportunity to talk with Carey about Harwell as both have likely given him - and any aspiring baseball broadcaster - inspiration over the years. As their discussion closed, Carey told Mario he'd be looking forward to his calls of Oakland University games later in the year. It was an interesting note to end on, but clearly one prominent enough in Carey's mind to bring up on a regional broadcast of a Major League Baseball game. Impemba offered his thanks and cut to commercial.

Coming off a conference championship and an NCAA Tournament appearance, it is a remarkable time to have ties to Oakland University. Paul Carey, a legend in his own right, knew this enough to recognize Impemba's broadcasting duties with OU during what was surely a much-viewed Tigers game! Impemba, who began working with the Golden Grizzlies two seasons ago, has been a key figure in bringing OU basketball to a respected level in the metro-Detroit area. From his first to second year alone, the program made the move to a better radio station which provided opportunities for more coverage, including most of the road games during the 2009-2010 season. His connection to the program has also boosted content on the Fox Sports television arm, giving the university the ability to televise a few home games each year. Impemba has also published columns on the FSD website at various points throughout the season.

In short, Mario Impemba has become a key person in the movement to make Oakland University basketball a special, special entity here in metro-Detroit. Credit is of course given to the people who make these things happen (Gary Russi, Tracy Huth, Greg Kampe, etc), but at the end of the day, the fans only remember the person talking dimes and dunks.

Impemba, due to name recognition first but style and dedication thereafter, has the chance to be remembered here. He can be an institution at Oakland University, the guy who called the games during championship seasons and deep tournament runs in Sioux Falls or Tulsa or wherever the conference tournament ends up in future years. He'll never be as revered by as many as a guy like Harwell or Carey - at least in this sport - but those who are there, those making the emotional investment, will be there for him every step of the way so long as he is there for us.

Every great team has someone calling its games by which the dedicated hear and make sense of the action at hand. While great teams can help define a program, they are ultimately constrained by time. A great program, on the other hand, obtains continued success over the long-term, and by staying true to the program, through thick and thin, a great broadcaster can become an institution. Immortality achieved.

Saturday, May 1, 2010

Showing Off Benson

Last summer, Keith Benson was invited to participate in a summer camp hosted by the NBA's Amare Stoudemire for promising big men in the college ranks. There is no doubt that Kito's participation here helped bring some exposure to the big man from the small school. He worked out amongst the likes of Greg Monroe (Georgetown), Larry Sanders (VCU), Jerome Jordan (Tulsa), and Cole Aldrich (Kansas) - all potential draft picks in June's NBA draft. During the regular season, Benson was dominant against Aldrich, holding the future NBA baller to 4 points on 2 for 10 shooting. While Kansas' runaway win limited Cole's minutes in the second half, anyone who remembers the game knows Benson had an affect on his play during the first half.

It was after this game when scouts and NBA draft experts started to take notice of Benson since this was considered his first big game against legitimate competition. The only other time Kito faced a touted big man was against Charles Garcia of Seattle (5 points in 20 minutes), but he was covered by other OU defenders as well. Benson may have been tested by Syracuse's Arinze Onuaku in late December, but he played just five short minutes due to injury. The next test with superior competition came in the biggest stage of them all, the NCAA Tournament, against Pittsburgh. Benson had an amazing offensive game scoring 28 points, 10 of those from the charity stripe. Pitt's big, Gary McGhee, had a solid game for a team that received most of its scoring from its guards.

It has become clear over the past few months that NBA scouts and draft experts draw up much of their analysis based on performances against other players with NBA potential. This is why the Aldrich match-up is so highly referenced. Now that Benson has withdrawn from this year's draft, Greg Kampe and his staff have vowed to do everything they can to get the Oakland center to the next level. Paramount in this process is scheduling a few out-of-conference games against teams with physical big men who are already on the radar of NBA personnel. With that said, let's take a look at a couple of match-ups that would do well in showing off Benson's capabilities.

The Likely, Yet Unlikely

Devin Ebanks - West Virginia University
- Ebanks is a 6-9 forward who would be entering his junior year in Morgantown. The catch is that he has declared for this year's draft already, but has shown up on more than a few lists as one of those guys who would benefit from another year in school. Assuming he comes back, it is very likely that OU would be playing WVU this coming season as this match-up has been rumored since the end of the NCAAs. Ebanks is more comfortable than Benson on the perimeter and is capable of making his own play from 10-15 feet away from the basket. Kampe has talked about trying to give Benson more opportunities with his face to the basket, so guarding Ebanks would be a great way to see how he stacks up against a similar-bodied player with NBA potential. Likewise, Ebanks could stand to improve his post play and needs to prove he can be physical in the paint. Seems like a match-up made in heaven for scouts. It would likely happen if Ebanks stays, but it appears unlikely that will happen at this juncture.

JaJuan Johnson - Purdue University
- Johnson's decision to enter the draft early was a surprise to most. It was thought amongst most college basketball arbiters that Johnson would come back for his senior season with E'Twaun Moore and Robbie Hummel to give Purdue a three-headed monster destined for a Final Four appearance. Instead, both he and Moore declared early but without agents. So the door is still open for Johnson to withdraw his name (before May 8) and make possible this match-up with Benson as Purdue is another opponent that has more or less been unofficially confirmed for next year's schedule. Johnson is another guy who, like Ebanks, can play in the post in college simply because of his height, but will likely need to rely more on his perimeter skills and athleticism to get by in the NBA. Because of this, he's not the perfect match-up for Benson to showoff his post moves, but he is a good one for him to show he can guard guys with athleticism and skills that aren't anchored in the paint. Johnson's draft decision could go either way at this point, but my best bet is that we'll see him back at Purdue next year on what should be a loaded team. When the schedule is released, let's hope OU is making a trip to West Lafayette.

The Other High Majors

Draymond Green/Derrick Nix - Michigan State University
- It is almost a lock that OU plays MSU every year, so we can reasonably expect to see this match-up in 2010-11. Green is no lock for a double-double, yet he did it last season against OU and Benson. While Benson had a double-double of his own, it'd be becoming of him as a top performer to shut-down a guy with a bit more bulk, if not only around the waist. Nix is also a heavy guy who looks to slim down this summer in his attempt to be a more productive performer for Tom Izzo. Benson will get his shot at the MSU bigs as always, and while neither have NBA scouts watching as much as Benson, it's still a shot to prove he's got what it takes to shut down big program players.

Jared Sullinger - Ohio State University
- I have never seen Sullinger play, but everyone and their mother is in love with this guy's ability in the paint and his physicality. He is expected to start for the Buckeyes in his freshman year and is likely a one-and-done center for Thad Matta like BJ Mullens and Greg Oden before him. At 6-10 and over 250 pounds, he is bound to be a tough guy to guard on size alone. And if he has the skills and abilities that are being touted by the talking heads, then look for this guy to be in the same vein as DeMarcus Cousins. If such a match-up were to occur, one would hope that Benson's athleticism and wisdom would overwhelm the youngster. It'd also serve as motivation to show that a senior who has honed his skills over four years would be better able to make an immediate impact on an NBA squad than a one-and-doner. Considering OU's location and tendency to play Big 10 teams, a game against tOSU is possible but has not been rumored as of yet.

The Mid-Majors

Eli Holman - University of Detroit
This match-up would mean so much on so many levels. U of D will be loaded next year with Holman in the paint and McDonald's All-American Ray McCallum, Jr. running the point. These two teams have not played in quite some time, so a renewed home-and-home series would surely fuel the competitive spirit of metro-Detroit. Holman is a big time player himself; maybe not on many NBA draft boards, but still respected for his interior presence. He had himself a number of solid games last year and looks to improve this year. Holman-Benson would be the match-up of the the match-up. Let's hope it happens!

Brandon Bowdry/Matt Balkema - Eastern Michigan University
This one might draw some frazzled looks from readers, but rest assured, this one needs to - and if history is correct, most likely will - happen. Last season, OU started the year off with a home game against the Eagles, and they lost. It was a shocking blow to lose to a team OU had beaten several times before with many of the same pieces. OU's big-three all put up big numbers, but there were times when the Golden Grizzly big men had trouble with EMU's size. Brandon Bowdry went off for 26/13 and beastly Matt Balkema pushed around Benson whenever he was on the court. There probably isn't much to prove to scouts in a game like this, but rest assured that OU fans want to see a dominating performance from Benson and the OU squad as a hole after last year's disappointing loss.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Top 3 Wins of the Non-Conference Season

Yesterday we took a look at Oakland's Top 3 Losses of the Non-Conference Season, ranking their lost to Eastern Michigan as the worst loss. Today we'll look at the brighter side of the non-con season by ranking the Top 3 Wins. The most important win in the first two months was undoubtedly the road win against IPFW, but because this was technically a conference match-up it does not apply to the criteria here.


3. Oakland at Tennessee Tech; November 23, 2009 (W, 77 - 56)
This win became Oakland's first against a Division I opponent in the non-conference season. After blowing the home opener against Eastern Michigan and then losing on the road to Wisconsin, it was imperative that the Grizzlies pick up an early-season win. This game appeared on OU's schedule because both squads were a part of the Hall of Fame Showcase, which guaranteed games at Memphis and Kansas along with one home and one road game against a mid-major. Most OU fans expected to beat the Golden Eagles, even though the game was Tech's first at home after a grueling road trip to start the season. Up until the 13-minute mark of the second half, it appeared as if this one would go down to the wire as the teams were tied at 45. But then the Grizzlies got hot and went on a 10-0 run before closing out the game with a 21-point victory, the largest on the road this season.

While Tennessee Tech has been a middling Ohio Valley Conference team the last few years, the win nonetheless came at a very important time, and it came on the road. The stellar performance from the Golden Grizzlies in the second half put to rest some of the fears we all had about their ability to close-out games. This win won't help OU's strength of schedule or RPI much, but it surely brought out many of the team's strengths when faced with a similar opponent.

2. Oakland at Seattle; December 17, 2009 (W, 77 - 68)
When looking at the OU schedule when it was first released, many deemed this a trap game. Not because anyone was expecting a freshly-minted DI school to have a solid year, but because it was on the West Coast and two days before the more sexy match versus Oregon. However, as the year wore on, SeattleU (as they call themselves) turned out to be quite a contender behind big man Charles Garcia and first-year head coach Cameron Dollar. The Redhawks beat up on a number of usually solid mid-major teams, including Weber State and Fresno State, and they even picked up a win on the road against Utah. To go along with this, Oakland would be playing SeattleU in a venue where they had won 14 straight. (Note: SeattleU plays its games at Key Arena, the same arena where the tenacious tandem of Shawn Kemp and Gary Payton unfortunately ran into MJ in his prime while wearing one of the best NBA uniforms ever).

The game was close for much of its duration, but the Grizzlies managed to get Garcia into some foul trouble and got some quality minutes from Larry Wright who scored a season-high 21 points on 6/13 FG and 7/7 FT. This was Wright's second straight-game where he played like the guy we all expected him to be, but more on that later. By the time the buzzer sounded, OU had put this one away, giving the team another quality win over a mid-major opponent, some 2,000 miles away from Rochester, Michigan. We're hoping this far-away road win is a sign of things to come when the guys travel to Cedar City, Utah in February, a place they haven't won at since the 2005-2006 season.

1. Oakland v. Green Bay; December 13, 2009 (W, 76 - 52)
This was the fourth season in a row OU had scheduled a game against the Phoenix, the last two being played in Green Bay. OU had the 2-1 lead in the series, but Green Bay was on a 5-game winning streak which included a gigantic home upset against the same Wisconsin Badgers that brought down OU earlier in the season. Without one of their best players on the floor due to an injury, it looked like Oakland would have a shot to compete against the Phoenix, and boy did they ever...

After a first-half where each team traded baskets, the Grizzlies took over for much of the second. The home team was sparked by the defensive intensity of Ledrick Eackles and the first great complete performance of the season from Larry Wright, who connected on three triples on his way to a line that included 18 points, 4 rebounds, 4 assists, and just 1 turnover. Keith Benson looked the best on paper behind a 23 point/18 rebound effort, and Derick Nelson had a solid complimentary night with 15/6. Overall, the team shot 50% on the night, their highest against a DI opponent this non-conference season. In sum, everything seemed to go right in this game, and it happened on a night against a hot team from a conference we aim to compete with year in and year out. While a win against a BCS school would have been nice while out-of-conference, the Green Bay win should serve as a quality benchmark for the Grizz as they head into Summit League play.

Top 3 Losses of the Non-Conference Season

The non-conference season is all but over after yesterday's loss to Syracuse. While the Golden Grizzlies have one more game left against DIII opponent Alma College, we're going to chalk that one up as a win. Rest assured, such a loss would surmount any of the losses on the list you are about to read. But we have faith that such a travesty will be avoided.

The non-conference season was one of ups and downs for OU. They played 6 teams from the Big Six, including 3 teams ranked in the top 15 at the time of each game. According to Pomeroy, the Grizzlies currently sit at 15th in the nation in non-conference Strength of Schedule, a ranking that will likely stay toward the top as the season goes on (and teams like Wisconsin and Memphis improve). With such a difficult schedule behind the team, it is time to look back at the results. We'll start by ranking the top 3 losses here and follow it up with a look at the top 3 non-conference wins later.


3. Oakland at Oregon; December 19, 2009 (L, 72 - 60)
Oakland had beat Oregon two years in a row, including last year where Jonathan Jones TOOK OVER in a stunning overtime victory in Eugene. We had their number. This was the game we'd finally knock off a BCS team. It was written.

It looked like it might actually happen as Oakland tied it at 44 at the 9:42 mark and were down by just 2 points 2 minutes later. But then Garret Sim hit his only bucket of the game, a 3 pointer, and his teammate Jamil Wilson did the same about a minute later to put the lead to 8 points. The Grizzlies could have fought back, but a questionable charge against Derick Nelson resulted in two shots for the foul, two shots for the double technical assigned to Coach Kampe, and the ball for the Ducks (where they would add 2 more points). All of a sudden, the Ducks had scored six points in what was essentially one possession, putting the Grizzlies in a hole they could not bounce back from. The guys still fought hard for the remaining 3 minutes or so, leaving Mac Court for the last time with a respectable 12-point loss. A respectable deficit means very little, though, when your team fought back to tie a game you very well could of, and should of, won. The Wisconsin loss was tough to stomach because Wisconsin wasn't predicted to be very good when OU played them, but then they went on to beat Duke and show they will be a player in the Big Ten this year. This loss hurts more then because the Ducks had proved through a month of play they were indeed nothing to write home about.

2. Oakland at Memphis; November 30, 2009 (L, 77 - 46)
Anyone who watched this game knows that it will likely go down as OU's worst performance of the 2009-2010 season. Going into the season, this looked like a winnable game as Memphis had a new coach and lost all of its big recruits. However, the Tigers got lucky when Eliot Williams, who was granted an immediate transfer from Duke, began to shine early in the season and became a key reason why Memphis nearly picked off No. 1 Kansas on a neutral court. A winnable game quickly turned into a game in which it was hoped the Grizzlies would at least stay competitive.

Compete they did not. Half-way through the first half, it appeared that the Grizzlies simply did not want to be on the court any longer. It worsened in the second half when the Tigers began capitalizing with fastbreak points (16 of them) and points off of turnovers (29 in total). OU committed 23 turnovers before it was all http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=5386812469537892059&postID=401645719111201247said and done. They shot 33% from the field, a range that has become all-too-familiar this season. Finally, the Tigers held Keith Benson to 9 points, the only time this season he has failed to reach double digits in scoring. This 31-point loss, while bad, came at the hands of a formidable foe on the road. This is why the next loss was even worse...

1. Oakland v. Eastern Michigan; November 14, 2009 (L, 81 - 77)
During the 2008-2009 season, Oakland dominated the MAC. The list of victims included Toledo, Eastern Michigan, and Kent State in a post-season tournament. Winning games against MAC teams is a big positive for Oakland because the MAC, along with the Horizon League, is often considered to be more premiere than the Summit League when it comes to Midwestern mid-major hoops conferences. This stat combined with the fact the Grizzlies were receiving a lot of preseason hype and were opening up the season at home made this loss to Eastern Michigan entirely unbearable.

The three-headed monster of Jonathan Jones (23/9 assts), Derick Nelson (20/12), and Keith Benson (15/13) all had great games statistically, but it was a lack of help from the bench and poor three-point shooting (4-22) that ultimately cost the Grizzlies the game. It was a tough loss to take, especially considering the crowd was large and loud for most of the game, providing a solid home-court advantage. It comes in as our worst loss of the non-conference season, though, because it ended up being OU's only loss to a mid-major program, and an in-state mid-major at that. It is important for Oakland to win the in-state battles with the Directional schools (and Detroit if they'd ever allow it) because it helps with recruiting and increasing OU's stature in Michigan. Not only that but EMU hasn't exactly turned out to be a dominant team this season, as they've lost to two teams expected to be the class of their respective leagues, The Citadel (SoCon) and Missouri State (MVC), and got blown out by an Evan Turner-less Ohio State by 51 points in their only game against a BCS team. To makes matters worse, the EMU loss broke the school's 14-game home winning streak. Needless to say, this is OU's worst loss of the non-conference season.