Saturday, December 11, 2010

The Gameplan's Weekly Recap: Illinois/Michigan State

This week's recap features thoughts and analysis on Oakland's games against two Big Ten opponents, Illinois and Michigan State.

The Big Picture
After watching the games against Illinois and Michigan State, one has to feel that Oakland is inching closer and closer to finally being able to knock off one of these top-ranked teams. It's easy to be negative about the losses, especially the one to Michigan State at The Palace, but there are a lot of positives to be taken from this week. For one, this year's team exudes confidence. They believe they can play with anyone in the country, and for the most part, they have shown that they can. It feels like Oakland will get one of these wins sometime soon, and if they don't by the end of December, you can bet that they'll be the most battle-tested Summit League team this season. That bodes well for the team's chances in the long run where the goal is to leave Sioux Falls with the nets in their hands.

The Anatomy of a Run
It's a common cliche in college basketball that a mid-major team must play "forty minutes of perfect basketball" in order to have a shot at a Red Line Upset. The heart of that statement is that these teams, those with less money and resources, just can't afford to make costly mistakes against those with the profile to recruit future NBA draft picks. At some point, talent simply takes over. Oakland fans know this well. We've seen the team come out strong against some of the nation's best teams, but at some point an OU turnover or missed rebound turns into points for the other team. And then those teams go on runs.

Another phrase heard a lot in basketball circles is that basketball is a game of runs. Watch enough mid-vs-high-major basketball games and one will notice that it's those runs that usually seal the fate of the little guys. In games against Purdue and Illinois, those runs have come in the second half. More specifically in Champaign on Wednesday, Illinois went on its run, one of the 18-0 persuasion, from the 17:47 mark, when Oakland was up by nine, until there was 12:52 left with the Illini now up seven. Here's how it happened:

17:29-16:54: Will Hudson held his ground in the paint, forcing a weak shot by Mike Tisdale that misses. Oakland came down the floor and worked the ball to Benson on the block, Mike Davis gets a piece of shot as it falls short. Oakland gets offensive board, resets the offense. Hamilton dishes to Benson on the left elbow, jumper falls short. Overall, not a bad possession.

16:54-16:47: Demetri McCamey takes ball coast-to-coast, Larry Wright fouls as he attempts a lay-up. Makes two free throws. Illinois run: 2-0.

16:47-16:32: Oakland turnover by Larry Wright.

16:32-16:12: McCamey sets the offense, gives it up to Jereme Richmond on the wing, and Oakland ends up with two big men on Richmond as a result of the screen. D.J. Richardson is cutting, but Wright leaves him to guard an unprotected Mike Tisdale in the post. Richardson buries the uncontested three. Hate to see a great three-point shooter open in the corner, but these things are bound to happen, as Coach Kampe has noted in the past, when the team's philosophy is not have Benson chasing guys on the perimeter. Illinois run: 5-0

16:12-15:48: Oakland works ball in the post to Benson who makes a move toward the basket and seemingly gets a shot off, but it's not called a shooting foul (seen below). This was one of the more questionable calls of the game, and Coach Kampe was irate as a result. Oakland resets out of the inbound, but loses the ball on a Drew Valentine pass to Will Hudson.

15:48-15:24: Illinois ball. Jereme Richmond leads the offense while Keith Benson was guarding him. This was one of the more interesting match-ups and one I didn't fully notice until rewatching the game. At this point, Hudson was guarding Tisdale inside, who again put up and missed a shot due to solid defense from Hudson. However, with Benson left to guard Richmond - who is a slashing playmaker - the freshman was able to slide into the lane and tip-in the Tisdale miss. That was the second of three plays where the Benson-Richmond mismatch led to an Illinois bucket. Illinois run: 7-0.

15:24-15:10: Oakland's offense was never really set on this possession. Ledrick Eackles made an attempt to get to the basket from the wing but was too long on a leaning jumper. If Eackles ever starts hitting those things (or getting the foul called), his presence will be much more welcome on the offensive end, at least in the mind of this observer.

15:10-14:59: McCamey pushed the ball up-court, gave it to Tisdale, then got it back on his way toward the basket. Here, Reggie Hamilton moved in front of McCamey and appeared to be set, but the senior point guard got the benefit of the doubt and a blocking foul was called on Hamilton. The basket also went in, as did the resulting free-throw. Perhaps more than any other call, this was the most questionable of the game, especially on a play that would give Illinois the lead. Illinois run: 10-0.

14:59-14:40: Larry Wright brings the ball up, sees a lane and makes a move toward the baseline. He gets a fairly nice look just outside of the paint on the left block, but it falls short, likely as a result of Mike Davis putting a hand in his face.

14:40-14:33: The Davis rebound off of Wright's miss leads to a fastbreak opportunity seemingly created by McCamey's speed. Instead of attacking the rack, McCamey spots up for a three-pointer and sinks it. Up until this point, the run was fairly unassuming, but this shot reenergized the crowd and the Fighting Illini as a team. Illinois run: 13-0.

14:33-14:05: Travis Bader makes a nice move on the perimeter to free himself of his defender, resulting in a jump shot just inside of the arc. Miss.

14:05-13:56: Richmond rebounds, passes to McCamey, who promptly comes down court and spots up for an NBA three. Hamilton contests it as best he can, but McCamey drains it. That was the second Illinois possession in a row where McCamey displayed no care for the hearts of his opponent. Just cold! Illinois run: 16-0.

13:56-13:43: Oakland ball. Bader loses the ball around the top of the key and somehow manages to also commit a foul. Not a good possession for the redshirt freshman.

13:43-13:23: Illinois sets its offense with McCamey off the ball. McCamey rotates off a screen and proceeds to slice through the Oakland defense on his way to an easy teardrop bucket. Illinois run: 18-0.

13:23-12:57: And this is how the run ended. Hamilton had a great look from deep, a miss that was rebounded by Benson. After an Illini player tipped it out of bounds, Hamilton got it to Eackles on the wing who missed an open look from the corner. After a tussle for the board, Hamilton ended up with it but missed the putback. The miss landed in Wright's hands who got yet another putback to finally go in. It was sloppy, but it put an end to a forgettable Illinois run.

By my count:
  • Five of the Illinois points resulted from missed Oakland defensive assignments.
  • Eight were the consequence of McCamey's talents alone: speed to push the ball up court, shooting touch from beyond the arc, and the stones to knock down tough shots. No one else touched the ball on the three plays that resulted in those eight points.
  • Three came from a questionable call, two from the shot McCamey hit and one from the And-1 free throw opportunity.
  • Two came as a result of Illinois' set offense designed to open a lane for McCamey.
And on the offensive end, Oakland had three turnovers, two to three poor shots (depending on your perspective), and one questionable call by the referees (calling a non-shooting foul when Benson may have in fact been making a move to shoot). The other possessions weren't bad, the shots just didn't fall. That combination did them in, and it's the same old story for most teams: turnovers, a few defensive lapses, missed opportunities, and - as we saw with McCamey - talent differential. Perfect is hard to do.

A Program, Showcased
Despite the one-point loss to Michigan State, Oakland had a great opportunity on Saturday to showcase the program. The game was played in front of a listed attendance of 17,115 which is a nice jump from the 15,361 figure the last time MSU visited OU at The Palace in 2008. Oakland had an impressive student turnout as well, and perhaps the first-timers or those watching at home saw a team play that they found would be worth their time and attention. Keith Benson had a great game to showcase his talents further, and Fox Sports Detroit even aired a great personal interest story on him during half-time (in a classy move, Benson noted after the game that he would have rather had a win). The telecast itself was top-notch, no doubt because of the knowledge play-by-play man Mario Impemba has gleaned from calling Oakland's road games this season. While one never knows how many times a chance to knock off Michigan State will come around, the hope is that such a performance will help continue to elevate the Oakland program to the point where close games like this happen every season.

The Curious Case of #12
Has any Oakland player had a more curious season offensively than Ledrick Eackles? The sophomore's best game came against Ohio, where he was able to use his quickness to get to the free throw line and his competitiveness to grab a considerable amount of boards. Aside from that game, Eackles has struggled mightily. He's taken one too many three-pointers in every game (he has made 3 of 25 all year) and his jump shot has been off in most games (28% shooting from the field). What makes his conundrum worse is that when he is able to get some penetration, his floaters and lay-ups haven't been falling with any regularity. In our minds, Eackles has still been playing strong defense and his quickness is such an asset on both ends of the court, but Oakland also needs him to be more efficient when he's on the floor. Take a look at some of his rankings using advanced metrics:
  • Using John Hollinger's Player Efficiency Ratings, which gives a snapshot of a player's efficiency and effectivness based on box score figures and then adjusted for pace, Eackles has a rating of 9.67. Among players who use over 18% of their teams possessions and play at least 15 minutes per game (again, based on Hollinger), his 9.67 rating ranks dead last in the conference. Players near him using the same standards are SUU's Ramell Taylor (11.75), NDSU's Eric Carlson (12.59), and UMKC's Bakari Lewis (13.25).
  • Using BBState.com's Average Efficiency figure, Eackles' 4.4 average ranks 67th in the conference, a range which puts him with a hodgepodge of young role players.
Maybe such comparisons aren't fair given Eackles is just a sophomore, but based on his age and the way he finished last season, it's safe to say the expectations for him were a bit higher than some of his conference brethren. This frustration is furthered when you take into consideration that Ledrick plays like a featured scorer: he currently has a usage percentage of 25.31%, just behind Keith Benson's 26.01% for team leader. In the conference, his usage rate puts in in the top thirteen. Others with higher usage rates: IUPUI's Alex Young, WIU's Matt Lander, ORU's Warren Niles and Dominique Morrison, UMKC's Jay Cousinard, SDSU's Nate Wolters, and others. There are a few outliers, but the overarching trend with those names is that they're are all All-Conference performers who use a lot of their team's possessions because they're featured scorers. Unfortunately, Eackles' production when compared to his usage rate just doesn't add up.

An argument could be made that Ledrick should have the ball in his hands. According to DraftExpress.com's rather deep stats database, the sophomore has the highest free throws attempted to possessions ratio on the team, by a wide margin. Essentially, Eackles has the innate ability to find gaps in the lane which often results in the other team fouling him. That's a good weapon to have, but it's only useful when he's attacking and not settling for three-pointers that he'll only make 12% of the time. We're big fans of Mr. Eackles here and love his intensity, so we hope he's just slumping with his shot selection right now. A confident Eackles who can knock down shots and get his teammates involved come conference season would make Oakland an even mightier beast.

Coach Kampe's Big Ten Road Trips
Much has been made about the fact that Oakland's schedule includes five Big Ten teams this year. Aside from the Michigan State game, all of the games have been or will be played on the road. That's a familiar concept for Oakland fans seeing as the team tends to play at least one team on the road against the Big Ten every year. Coach Kampe has talked at length about why he schedules these games, but we can't help but wonder if Coach also has a side goal to coach a game in every Big Ten arena by the time he hangs it up. To see how far he would have to go, I went through the archives to see just how many times Coach Kampe has taken Oakland to a Big Ten arena.

As we can see, Coach Kampe has coached at least one game on the road against eight of the Big Ten's eleven teams. The figures in this table include this year's games, and as we can see the out-of-state combination of Illinois, Ohio State, and Purdue were not new additions for Kampe. In all of these games, Oakland has only won one time (at Northwestern). Still, there is something to be said for having coached one's team in some of the nation's most historic arenas. Anecdotal evidence would suggest that Kampe at least considers that in scheduling games, as he has taken his team to places like UCLA's Pauley Pavillion and Kansas' Phog Allen Fieldhouse in addition to some of the more storied arenas in the Big Ten. What's interesting is that he has yet to take Oakland to either Indiana's Assembly Hall or Minnesota's The Barn, the former which proudly boasts five national championship banners and the latter which is one of the country's oldest venues. For Indiana, Coach Kampe already has a scheduling connection with IU coach Tom Crean: they did a 2-for-1 in the middle of last decade while Crean was still at Marquette, an agreement that brought the Golden Eagles to the O'Rena in 2004-2005. So who knows, perhaps in the next few seasons we'll see Coach Kampe try to schedule these games to complete his Big Ten road trip.

"Free Ilija" Watch
Oakland was able to keep its games this week rather close, which meant lots of playing time for Keith Benson and Will Hudson. Still, in the Michigan State game Ilija gave the Golden Grizzlies some solid minutes. He did not commit any fouls in nine minutes of play with zero mistakes. It would have been something else if his triple attempt had fallen through the net. For what it's worth, Lindsey Hunter, who was providing commentary on the FSD telecast, was very complimentary of the seven-footer!

Non-Keith Benson Stud Of The Week: Larry Wright
A weekly shoutout to the best Golden Grizzly not named Keith Benson.
A week after we wrote about wanting to see Larry Wright get more of his baskets by driving, he comes out against Michigan State and drains four of his five three-point attempts. Wright had a performance that hearkened back to his Saint John's days, and though he was turnover prone against MSU, his performance was largely responsible for keeping Oakland in the game during a few stretches there. Kudos to Wright for his offensive explosion while Reggie Hamilton struggled from the field. It's not often we get to see that from him this year in his new role!

Top Play Of The Week
We don't have an animated .gif of it, but how sick was Larry Wright's block on Korie Lucious? Wright had the ball picked from him, Lucious ran down court for what he presumed would be an easy lay-up, and Wright came flying in with the monster block. The Fox Sports Detroit telecast had several great views of it via replay, including one from a camera looking down on the court. Monster block.

What's Next?
Oakland continues its toughest stretch of the season with a game at Tennessee on Tuesday night. The Vols are currently undefeated coming off an absolute drubbing of Pittsburgh at Pittsburgh. Following that, the Golden Grizzlies will take a quick bus ride to Ann Arbor to face Michigan. Early indications are that more than a few OU fans will be in attendance on Saturday. Go Grizzlies!

Friday, December 10, 2010

Game Preview: Oakland vs. Michigan State

Game 10: Oakland (5-4) vs Michigan State (6-3)
Saturday, December 11, 2010 | 12:30pm at The Palace
TV: Fox Sports Detroit | Radio: WDFM-AM (1130)

It's the second game in a row against a Big Ten opponent for Oakland as the Michigan State Spartans come to Oakland County for a pseudo-home game at The Palace of Auburn Hills. For the Golden Grizzlies, this game is also their first to be aired on local television this season through Fox Sports Detroit. And boy should it be an entertaining viewing experience. We have the state's premier program going up against one of the state's strongest mid-major programs, both coming off of NCAA Tournament appearances. The individuals aren't half bad either, as MSU features a few of the best players in the Big Ten and the country, while Oakland is centered by one of the nation's most productive big men with NBA potential in Keith Benson. OU has also played a tough schedule which has included competitive games against Purdue and Illinois. The Spartans are coming off what Coach Tom Izzo said was one of the most disappointing losses in his tenure to a solid Syracuse squad. Izzo's team will be aiming to reignite themselves, while Oakland will be looking to come out strong as they have against top opponents thus far to prove the close game at Illinois was no fluke.

Home Away From Home
Though metropolitan areas can present problems for mid-major programs, namely the number of sports entities competing for fan attention, they can also offer them additional resources. For a few metro schools in The Summit League, the biggest resource of all is bigger arenas. Oakland enjoys such an advantage since its campus is located just eight minutes from The Palace of Auburn Hills, the home of the NBA's Detroit Pistons. For the last few seasons, Oakland has been able to bring in high-profile opponents for a game or two here, including both Michigan State and Michigan. There are plenty of upsides to hosting games at The Palace: larger crowds, neat opportunities for students, television crews, increased media interest, and a chance to showcase the program on a bigger stage. The attendance numbers also count toward Oakland's season figures, a factor which gives its annual average a hefty boost. Despite this, the only downside is that those additional fans are usually there to root for the opponent when that team is MSU or UofM. Even though you might see more green and white than black and gold in the stands, this is not the Breslin Center, and that is a distinct advantage for the Golden Grizzlies.

A Glimmer Of Hope
Among advanced statistics enthusiasts, there is a concept known as "The Four Factors" which more often than not can tell the story of how a team won a game. The factors included are effective field goal percentage, turnover rate, offensive rebounding percentage, and free throw rate. The thought is that if a team can control all of these factors or at least a majority of them, there is a greater chance that they will win the game. More often than not, when one looks through these measures for games pitting mid-majors against high-majors, the high-major will have the majority advantage (and thus usually win). While all of these measures can tell us something about a team's tendencies in a tempo-free sense, for Oakland's game against Michigan State I wanted to look into two areas in particular: offensive rebounding percentage and turnover rate. The reason for my curiosity stems from the fact that OU has generally rebounded well this season, particularly on the offense end, and because poor interior defense and turnovers have been cited as causes of Michigan State's letdown performances, particularly its last game against Syracuse. Looking at this season so far and the three preceding it, here is what I found (OR%=Offensive Rebound %, TR=Turnover Rate, NR=National Rank):
As we can see, Michigan State is typically one of the top ten rebounding teams in the country, rebounding about 40.0% of its missed shots every season. Oakland hasn't exactly been a slouch in this area, either, seemingly always in the top 25% of the nation in this regard. This season, however, MSU is outside of the top 50 while Oakland is in the top 10. Oakland also has the edge in turnover rate, a category MSU has never been great in but one it is especially struggling with this season. The reason any of this matters is revealed in the last column which is MSU's margin of victory over Oakland in each of the last three seasons. The only time Oakland had the edge in both offensive rebounding percentage and turnover rate was in 2007-08 when the Golden Grizzlies lost by just four points in East Lansing. As the table shows, Oakland currently enjoys an advantage by both of these measures so far this season. Some could cite a difference in scheduling strength as the reason why, which is a valid concern, but at their basic level, the numbers don't lie. If OU fans are looking for a reason to have an objective glimmer of hope heading into this match-up, an offensive rebounding and ball control advantage surely offers one.

Key Personnel Match-Up
Reggie Hamilton vs. Kalin Lucas
Not only is it the second straight game against a Big Ten team, but it's also the second straight game against an All-American caliber point guard. Kalin Lucas has had a few strong games this year, but as Andy Katz pointed out earlier this week, he still hasn't regained his explosiveness after injuring his Achilles last March. Still, Lucas is a senior leader capable of changing the game for the Spartans. Reggie Hamilton may not be a senior, but he sure has been playing like a seasoned Oakland veteran despite having a year off last season due to his transfer. Hamilton was tasked with guarding Illinois senior guard Demetri McCamey on Wednesday, and while Lucas probably won't score quite as much as McCamey did, he'll still be just as tough an opponent. Oakland's big men should do their work in the frontcourt, but for the Golden Grizzlies to stay in this game, they'll need a big performance from Hamilton, as always.

Michigan State Player To Watch: Draymond Green
He might be the easy pick for this feature, but you just can't undervalue what Draymond Green does for the Spartans. The 6'6" junior is a statistical machine. His per game averages: 13 points, 9.6 rebounds, 4 assists, 52% FG shooting, 2.1 steals, and 1.6 blocks. Green is capable of doing whatever it is his team needs of him, whether it's a big scoring night, a balanced double-double, or distributing to his teammates from the high post. He got the best of Oakland last season with a double-double and that was when OU had Derrick Nelson at the forward spot. Green has lost some weight since then and only gotten better.

Oakland Player To Watch: Keith Benson
Keith Benson has had a rather successful career against Michigan State. In his sophomore year, just a week after he showed everyone what he was capable of against Michigan at The Palace, Benson had a 20-point effort against the Spartans in the same venue - and that was after they knew he was coming. Last year in East Lansing, the then junior had a double-double. Despite the promising individual performances, Benson and Oakland came up on the losing end in each. This is the senior's last chance to upend the state's best basketball program. Combine that nugget of motivation with the fact that Oakland is coming off a close loss to Illinois where a thick double-team prevented Benson from getting many looks and you have a team and its best player that will be eager to show the state of Michigan what Oakland is all about.

History
Oakland opened the O'Rena in the fall of 1998 with a game against Michigan State, a 96-66 loss. Since then, Oakland has fared much better at its home arena but has never been able to upset Tom Izzo's squad. OU's total record: 0-9. Average loss margin: 24 points. The team loss by just 4 points in the 2007-08 season with a team that featured much younger versions of Keith Benson and Will Hudson. This will be the second time the two teams have met at The Palace, the first meeting resulting in an 82-66 Spartan victory in 2008-2009.

Opponent Q&A
Contributer LVS from the SBNation.com Michigan State blog The Only Colors was kind enough to answer a few of our burning questions about this year's Spartans.

In the Syracuse game, it looked like the Spartans frontcourt had trouble dealing with Rick Jackson and guard penetration. Was this an isolated issue, or does this team have a legitimate weakness in its interior defense? Either way, who needs to step up their play to correct it?

LVS: It's tough to say at this point, but I fear that it might be. In the first two losses of the year, MSU was done in by perhaps the two finest guards in the country -- UConn's Kemba Walker and Duke's Kyrie Irving -- and there are very few defenses in the country that could handle those two players. I didn't see guard penetration as the real killer against Syracuse, but as you say, the MSU frontcourt couldn't handle Rick Jackson. Syracuse's interior passing was outstanding and opened up many opportunities, but there were plenty of instances where MSU's bigs were outmuscled, as reflected in the rebounding statistics. It's certainly not ideal, and it's becoming more and more apparent how much this team misses Raymar Morgan.

It's unfair to say that Adreian Payne needs to step up, as he's only eight games into his college career, but clearly he's the player who has the ability to make the biggest difference. He's shown flashes of his ability and potential but has looked lost (particularly on the defensive end) even more frequently. Delvon Roe is a strong defender but lacks the size to handle the biggest centers. Derrick Nix has that size, but is highly inconsistent, as you know. I expect for this situation to become far less dire over the next couple months, but there clearly are issues at this point.

Can you tell us a little bit about the Spartan bench? Who has the ability to have a big game, especially in a match-up with a squad like Oakland? What should we expect of Derrick Nix and Adreian Payne?

LVS: Well, Draymond Green has been coming off the bench this season (it's sort of farcical -- he checked into the Syracuse game 45 seconds after the opening tip) and I'm sure Grizzlies fans know about him. He's outstanding at nearly every facet of the game, aside from free throw shooting, sadly. Otherwise: Korie Lucious still turns the ball over far too often for anyone's taste, but his shot looks much better this season and has quite frequently been the best player on the floor for MSU. Keith Appling, essentially -- he's been a turnover machine but showed several flashes of his potential in Maui. Austin Thornton has given the team some good minutes off the bench, and he's being a bit more assertive with his shot, which is good.

Adreian Payne's defense was discussed previously. On offense, he's enormously raw, so much so that he's not contributing much at the moment, but he has talent to burn. If MSU takes a sizeable lead in this game, you might see him get a bunch of minutes -- he really needs game experience. Major improvement by Derrick Nix is perhaps the singlemost thing that could improve this team, but I'm skeptical that will happen anytime soon, honestly. As you probably know, he flirted with quitting the team and did not travel to the Maui Invitational. Against Syracuse he looked more assertive on offense, which is good -- but he still plays out of control and is a very, very poor ball handler. Additionally, his free throw shooting is really, really bad, and that limits his offensive utility. So, there are issues, but the depth is clearly there.

There was a stretch in the first half of the Duke game where sophomore Garrick Sherman was essentially the MSU offense. It seems like he's capable of having great runs like that to help the team even though he's not a featured scorer. Tell us a little bit about his game and why MSU fans like him on the court?

LVS: Sherman has improved quite a bit this season, and given MSU's interior struggles on offense and defense, the opportunity certainly exists for him to grab lots of playing time. His effectiveness was really limited by Syracuse's big men, but Sherman has displayed impressive low-post moves and a knack for finishing. He's certainly been a nice surprise overall.

A lot of columns have been written about MSU's start, but anyone who follows the team knows they always tend to come around especially late in the season (and it's not like any of their loses have come to bad teams). As a Spartan fan, what do you hope to see out of the team against Oakland on Saturday that might give you an indication that everything will indeed be okay?

LVS: This may sound obvious, but the best possible thing for MSU would be to win this game going away. Oakland is a good team and Izzo and the other coaches clearly have respect for the Grizzlies -- but there's no comparison between the two rosters. Even several of MSU's wins this season have been of the too-close-for comfort variety; another one of those efforts, even in a win, would be somewhat distressing. As for individual things on the wishlist: Kalin Lucas being more aggressive in driving to the basket, winning the rebounding battle convincingly, improvement from Appling and Payne, and, above all else, not turning the ball over.

We thank LVS for taking the time to respond, particularly given his very detailed answers! Much respect. Be sure to check out The Only Colors for their perspective on this game as well.

The Extra Pass
Michigan State suffered a 72-58 loss to Syracuse on Tuesday night at Madison Square Garden. Tom Izzo gave his team - and himself to a certain extent - a scathing review following the game. A few quotes from the recap:

"It's gut check time for us," he said. "I'm as disappointed in that performance as I've been in any since I've been at Michigan State. Credit Syracuse or the one man who kicked our butt. We didn't come early inside and let them dominate on the boards. We turned into a pretty-boy jump-shooting team instead of the blue-collar, fist-fighting team we should be.

"Our guys inside weren't covering anybody and that's solely on me. If the team doesn't play hard enough and is tough enough that's the coach's fault and we'll fix that. I feel like the New York Jets."

"The aggressive team usually gets the advantage," Izzo said, "but we were taking it like a sissy and they took it up like men."

"Nine for 16 just isn't good," Izzo said. "It's been a long time since we were manhandled like this. To be honest with you, it's been a long time."

If there is anything to be worried about as Oakland fans, it has to be how Izzo and his team will respond after that Syracuse performance. They've had three days to learn from their mistakes in preparing for Oakland, which isn't exactly the ten days Brian Belichick had to prepare his team for a dismantling of the aforementioned Jets, but in college basketball it might be the equivalent. For what it's worth, the last time Michigan State suffered a BCS letdown before Oakland was in 2007-08. The team lost to a Kevin Love-powered UCLA team prior to hosting Oakland, and the Spartans only beat OU by four points.

As always, if you'd like to give your thoughts on the Oakland-MSU game, you can head over to the Golden Grizzly Hoops forum to post with other fans before, during, and after the game: Game Thread.

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Game Preview: Oakland at Illinois

Game 9: Oakland (5-3) at Illinois (8-1)
Wednesday, December 8, 2010 | 8:00pm

Oakland enters a four-game swing which features games at Illinois, at The Palace against Michigan State, at Tennessee, and at Michigan. Three of those teams are currently ranked in the Top 25 in the nation, and Michigan has proven to be no slouch with its recent road victory over Clemson. Needless to say, this might be one of the toughest stretches of games the program has ever had. Fortunately, the Golden Grizzlies have won four in a row, including two spectacular performances at home over the weekend, so their confidence level should be high heading into the game with Illinois. The Fighting Illini have looked very strong early on, which their 8-1 record clearly indicates. Their sole loss was on a neutral court to Texas in overtime, and they also have wins over Maryland, North Carolina, and Gonzaga.

Making It Rain
This year's Illinois team has a lot of talent, including a few future pros, at nearly every position on the court. They can beat opponents in several different ways but are particularly lethal when they make it rain from deep. As a team, the Fighting Illini are shooting 41.4% from beyond the arc, good for 20th in the nation. But this isn't a team that just jacks up treys all night long; they can also defend the perimeter extremely well, as they are currently allowing opponents to shoot just 26.8% from deep which is 22nd in all of Division I. The team's offensive 3FG% is lessened a bit by lower shooting percentages from forwards Tyler Griffey and Bill Cole. What's really scary is that their four biggest threats from deep are shooting a combined 46.6%, led by Demetri McCamey's 52.8% and D.J. Richardson's 50.0% marks. Brandon Paul also loves to shoot the three-ball, and 7-footer Mike Tisdale can go out there and knock a few shots down as well. Essentially, this team is capable of knocking down half of their three-pointers when needed. Against Gonzaga on Saturday, the Illini opened the second half by scoring 10 of their first 11 baskets from downtown. If they are allowed a run like that against Oakland, the end result will be quite lopsided.

Krush'd
With all of its games against Big Ten opponents, Oakland enthusiasts don't just get to see good basketball teams, they also get to see some of the country's best student sections in action. In our preview of the Purdue game, we highlighted The Paint Crew as one of the most regimented, uniform student sections in all of college basketball. Against Illinois, we'll see a wilder bunch in The Orange Krush which sits as close to the floor as any student section out there. Oakland's Grizz Gang has come a long way, but it can always learn from watching some of these Big Ten groups. The Illini student supporters are perhaps best known in the Big Ten for the spectacles they put on during road games. Seemingly every year, hoards of students buy tickets to away games, go to the arena clad in the opposing school's colors, and then reveal their true colors - that vibrant orange - in a swift move during the Illinois player introductions. Thanks to modern technology, we can actually see this happen during a game at Iowa here. Although the Grizz Gang has given Oakland a great fan presence at the IPFW away game, we can't help but think how great it would be if the OU students were able to adopt this model for games in the future. While Summit League games might be out of the question due to distance, there will likely be opportunities to travel to an Ohio-based school during the non-conference season in the future. The opposing school's fans would never forget something like that.

Key Personnel Match-Up
Keith Benson/Will Hudson vs. Mike Davis/Mike Tisdale
Mike Davis and Mike Tisdale together give Illinois the most seasoned frontcourt in the Big Ten this season. They are both seniors, average approximately 11 points and 7 rebounds per game, and have skillsets that could be utilized at the next level. Similarly, Oakland's downlow duo of Keith Benson and Will Hudson has looked dominant already in Summit League play, and they level the playing field a bit against the high major teams. Benson & Hudson versus Mike & Mike should be a fun match-up to watch, though the sexier match-up would feature Benson on Davis more often than not, as both are the stronger NBA prospects of the bunch. Davis is far from a true center and may not even be the typical NBA power forward, but he can bang in the post and knock down mid-range jumpers with the best of them. He reminds me a bit of a guy like Jeff Green of the Oklahoma City Thunder, capable of doing just about whatever his team needs with his versatility. Benson can guard guys like Davis and even replicate how they get their offense, but as a fan I'd love to see him try to out-muscle both him and Tisdale. The 7'1" Tisdale has a bit of finesse to his game which can stretch defenses, but it'd be interesting to see what Oakland could do against him if Benson and Hudson force him to play exclusively inside.

Illinois Player To Watch: Jereme Richmond
Jereme Richmond hasn't been the most talked about freshman in the nation this season, but he certainly has the abilities to put himself in that discussion based on potential. He's a guy who NBA talent evaluators love for his size, length, and athleticism. Once some of these seniors graduate, Richmond's production will surely skyrocket as he gets more minutes. The freshman is a 6'7" wing with a diverse skillset, but what gives him an edge against Oakland is his ability to get to the basket. In the game against Texas, it was Richmond who had the ball in his hands to send the game to overtime, something he achieved with a quick stab to the basket and great shot fake that led to an easy lay-in against solid defensive pressure. Oakland's guards will have their hands full with McCamey, Brandon Paul, and D.J. Richardson, but if there is one area where the Golden Grizzlies might not have a match, it's against a guy like Richmond.

Oakland Player To Watch: Travis Bader
Against Oakland's two biggest opponents, Travis Bader has shot 46% from deep. In the other six games, the redshirt freshman has a mark of just 32%. Maybe it's the bright lights, but Bader has made his presence known in Oakland's BCS road games this season. He hasn't been quite as effective from deep since the Southern game, so hopefully the team's return to a big arena will reinvigorate the three-point threat. The Golden Grizzlies will need every point they can get against Illinois, so a confident Travis Bader would surely go a long way in keeping the game close.

History
Oakland has played at Illinois two times in the back-to-back years of 2003 and 2004. The results were oddly similar: an 88-53 loss in 2003 and an 85-54 loss in 2004. Interestingly, Oakland's loss to Illinois in 2004 was but a minor blip for the Fighting Illini that season, the one in which they very nearly went undefeated, losing just their final Big Ten game of the regular season and to North Carolina in the national championship. Oakland was also that same North Carolina team's first round opponent in the NCAA Tournament that year as a 16-seed, a game which the Grizzlies lost 96-68. Judging by their win margins over Oakland, Illinois was the better team that year by three points!

Opponent Q&A
We checked in with Joe from the SBNation.com Illinois blog Hail To The Orange to get his opinion on a few our thoughts and questions.
We've seen Brandon Paul enter the starting line-up in two of the last three games in place of Bill Cole. What contributed to that move, and how do you feel the team performs with three guards in the line-up to begin games?

Joe: The biggest factor has been Bill Cole's move from being a moderate contributor on offense to falling almost completely off of the radar. He is still one of the stronger defenders on the team but he has had some trouble being the threat on the court that the team needs. Despite Cole's size he basically plays a guard position anyhow, so for the rotation it doesn't really change much.

Demetri McCamey's offensive numbers are strong and he's shooting a pretty remarkable percentage, but I know a lot of folks wanted to see some consistency from him on the defensive end. How do you feel about his defensive play through the first month of the season?

Joe: He has picked it up quite a bit. He isn't really a liability on defense, and you couldn't always say that in the past. He won't be a guy we put on a the other team's PG but he keeps up with the two guard and he will not shy away from contact, so by all means come at him if you think he will let you through uncontested. Its never going to be his strength, but lord knows with as much work as he has to do on offense, he may have earned to take a few defensive possessions off.

Aside from the starters and Jereme Richmond, which Illinois player in your mind has the ability to make an impact on the game, whether offensively or defensively, against a mid-major opponent like Oakland? In other words, which unheralded player should we watch out for in this game?

Joe: Meyers Leonard is a seven foot tall ball of basketball excitement. He will be whenever Tisdale needs a spell and he will probably get increased minutes in a game like this. He is the opposite of Tisdale in a lot of ways. He gets his points at the hoop with power and physicality and might have one of the most spectacular dunking talents on the team. I am just glad to know we have 3 more seasons to see this kid develop.

The Fighting Illini haven't had any major missteps so far this season, even against some tougher opponents. What is it that defines this year's Illini squad so far? Any weaknesses?

Joe: Weakness is what it has been for the last three seasons. We don't have a true powerful inside presence, we slide out, we get pushed out of position, we don't go strong to the hoop and we tend to get out rebounded. That said, our big men, Mike and Mike, are very good at the game that they play, if you give them an open shot they are going to bury it from the baseline. If you lay off of our guards they will kill you with jump shots. We play off of the screen and roll as well as anyone can and we get a lot of mileage out of it.

Thanks to Joe for answering our questions. In Hail To The Orange's preview, they have anticipated an easy win for Illinois, something they are not alone in thinking. In its Weekly Watch post, ESPN.com highlighted the Illini as its team of the week which featured this money quote: "Illinois still has one more major nonconference event: the Border War against Missouri in St. Louis. If it wins that toss-up game, Bruce Weber's group should be 12-1 heading into the rugged Big Ten season." Now it's very uncommon for mid-majors to take down ranked opponents that are clearly proven, but it seems folks are overlooking Oakland just a bit. One can be sure that Bruce Weber and his staff have not overlooked this game, so regardless of what the media thinks, the Fighting Illini team will be ready for the Golden Grizzlies.

The Extra Pass
The interesting thing about this year's Illinois squad is that it largely features the same pieces as last season, one that did not even result in an NCAA Tournament appearance. Granted, D.J. Richardson and Brandon Paul are sophomores now and presumably have grown, but the core of McCamey, Davis, and Tisdale has been around for a while now. This team looks better than last season's already, but if that is the case, then it's because of something other than talent, as Sports Illustrated's Seth Davis notes:

When Illinois players walk into their locker room, a simple question greets them on the greaseboard: Boys or men? The words were put there by Illini coach Bruce Weber last spring after his team's season ended ignominiously with a quarterfinal loss in the NIT. Weber recognized that his players had talent. What they lacked was toughness, physical and especially mental. That's why they folded down the stretch, dropping five of their last seven games to miss out on the NCAA tournament.

The most palpable change can be seen in the physiques of Illinois' two senior big men, 7-1 center Mike Tisdale and 6-9 power forward Mike Davis. They are finesse players who would rather face up than post up, but now they are carrying considerably more muscle. Tisdale added 30 pounds in the weight room in the offseason. Davis gained 15. Both were by design. "Tisdale can shoot it, but midway through the Big Ten season he quit posting up," Weber said. "Same thing with Mike Davis. He'd get his double-double, but it was a quiet double-double. You never watched him and thought, 'Wow, he just took that rebound away from somebody.' "

Toughness is also a matter of leadership. That's where McCamey comes in -- and goes missing. Last season, he ranked second in the nation in assists per game (7.1), and he was 11th in the Big Ten in scoring (15.1). However, he was also 11th in minutes played at 34.5 per game, and that took a toll. "We depended on him so much. He had to handle the ball every time, make every play, play almost every minute," Weber said. "He tended to rest a little bit on the defensive end."

Like Davis, McCamey put his name in the NBA draft and then returned to school. The scouts and general managers McCamey talked to were all impressed with his offensive abilities. The two things they wanted to see from him were more consistent effort on the defensive end and evidence that he can lead a winning team. Now, Weber reminds McCamey at every opportunity that playing D won't just help the Illini. It will also help his future.

When the Illini are able to combine their talent with that inherent drive to win, they can be a pretty scary team. They haven't had a letdown yet this season, and if they do, will it come at home? The Golden Grizzlies have some interesting players who can compete with the Illini players, but to go into Champaign and pull the upset against this squad would require an absolute beast of a performance. As Grizzlies fans, let's hope for one!

To get in on the Oakland-Illinois conversation, you can head over to the Golden Grizzly Hoops forum to post with other fans before, during, and after the game: Game Thread.

Monday, December 6, 2010

What We Can Learn From The Butler Way

By now, everyone knows about Butler. The school's 2009-10 season inspired countless articles and blog posts, a book, and even all-access features by ESPN usually reserved for the blue bloods. Gordon Hayward's last shot in the national championship game has its own Sports Science episode. The word is out there, and the words haven't stopped. Last weekend, Butler played Duke in a rematch of last year's grand finale, which inspired loads of feature stories, Tweets, and commentary from the national media. It was clear that even though this year's Butler team had a different make-up, their story was still worth telling.

The way Butler goes about its business - The Butler Way, as it has been termed - is unique. Butler plays a magnificent brand of basketball which has been employed to beat the biggest of opponents despite a steep talent differential. Seeing it up close and personal, as I did just a few weeks ago, cements that concept. But perhaps the most alluring thing about The Butler Way isn't what happens on the court, but that which occurs around it.
As a fan of Oakland basketball and the university, I was interested to experience The Butler Way firsthand to see how they had done it and how it differed from OU. I quickly found out Oakland basketball is not heading in a direction to be like Butler basketball. Even though "the next Butler" might replace "the next Gonzaga" in the mid-major lexicon, I'm not sure any program out there can be like Butler. That becomes apparent when you visit the Butler campus, nestled in a peaceful neighborhood of Indianapolis, and its historic arena, Hinkle Fieldhouse. There is just too much tradition there to be replicated overnight. But mid-major programs like Oakland can still learn a bit from The Butler Way.

I voyaged to Hinkle Fieldhouse as a part of a mini-hoops road trip which also took a friend and I to a game at Assembly Hall in Bloomington, Indiana, and the Oakland-Purdue match in West Lafayette. The Oakland game was obviously the most anticipated of the three, yet the experience at Hinkle continues to stand out as the most memorable from that weekend. After parking on a neighborhood side street, the first thing that struck me as we made our walk to Hinkle was the sheer number of people who were doing the same. It seemed as if though every street was pouring folks clad in Butler Blue toward the fieldhouse for the afternoon basketball match. Butler basketball was an event. It was worth taking a few hours out of your day off to see something special transpire on the court (as the Butler basketball team rarely let folks down). Most importantly, it was something to do with your friends, family, kids, or whoever else desired to see such an event.

These fans weren't there because of the Final Four appearance. You got the sense the gray-haired man in the Butler sweater had been doing this for most of his adult life, and that he was grooming the 10-year old grandkid following him around to continue to do so for most of his own. There were young families, maybe folks who were new to Indianapolis, who had bought-in at some point. Drifting around the campus a few hours before the game, the few scattered student present were wearing their DAWG POUND shirts, presumably readying themselves for their student section duties that afternoon. And in the neighborhoods surrounding Hinkle, homes had Bulldogs banners hanging outside. There was even a vehicle driving by with one of those flapping car flags emblazoned with the Butler Bulldog!

All of this was for a tiny school in a city with three universities, an NBA franchise, and a perennial powerhouse in the NFL in a state with one of the most storied college football schools and one of the tradition-rich college basketball powers. Sitting there in Hinkle, I wondered how Butler basketball was able to rise above all of these competing sports interests to form the community it had. How was this team this important to this many people?

The answer to that question is complicated. A big factor is time, of which Butler has had a lot of to build a winning program and, perhaps just as importantly, a larger base of alumni and supporters. But I think another component is the character of the program. The players are touted as good students, the coach is incredibly likable, and the fans are great. The latter group is cordial, encouraging, and seemingly grateful for what they have. They want their team to win, of course, but it's almost as if the complete experience of attending the games and cheering the Bulldogs is the means of their fandom. At less lucky or more entitled schools, fandom is an end only achieved if the team is winning games. At Butler, you get the sense this will go on forever.

Oakland faces a lot of the same struggles that Butler has faced and maybe even more. After all, metro-Detroit also has an NHL franchise and loads of alumni from the state's two biggest schools which have both storied college football and basketball programs. Still, Butler has managed to build a supportive community of fans among the diverse subsets - students, faculty, alumni, and community members at-large. They can fill Hinkle Fieldhouse to the rafters, making Butler basketball an event. And it's not just an event that you show up to. No, you come fully decked out in your Butler Blue apparel or whatever you can manage to show you are rooting for the home team.

Over the past few years, Oakland basketball has been building to the point of becoming an event in the Rochester area. I was fortunate enough to be a student during this time period that featured growing crowds and, yes, a lot of winning. I'm bought in, probably for life. And my extended family has bought in, too. This trend among young alumni will surely continue to grow as students graduate from the active Grizz Gang to the Gold Zone. But where Oakland can really learn from Butler is in activating those at-large community members, the folks with no real connection to the school other than location. Mid-major basketball isn't the easiest sell in the world to a casual observer, but Oakland's basketball product is rather marketable. It just needs to be marketed.

That last statement isn't a condemnation of the university's efforts to promote Oakland basketball as much as it is a reminder that there can always be improvement. It's not just on the university, it also requires cooperation from the media, both print and television (and Oakland should have a great opportunity to sell itself on Saturday against Michigan State at The Palace). But the biggest effort can be made at the grassroots level by us as fans. As Coach Kampe noted after a recent game, we've got to spread the word about Oakland basketball. We can tell everyone we know to watch the team on Fox Sports Detroit this Saturday, and if they like what they see, we can bring them to the O'Rena later this month. I've been to Butler and seen what that atmosphere is like, and it's chilling. I believe Oakland's fanbase can get to the point where Golden Grizzlies basketball is an event and the atmosphere is consistently chilling. We each just have to do what we can to help it get to that point.

Saturday, December 4, 2010

The Gameplan's Weekly Recap: Southern/APSU/SUU/UMKC

It's the third edition of the Gameplan's Weekly Recap, and it's also a super-sized one. Due to the holiday weekend, we opted to wait to do a recap directly after the Chicago Invitational, instead jam-packing our analysis and thoughts from those games with the two conference games that recently took place at the O'Rena. Here we go.

The Big Picture
Oakland wraps up the extended week on a four-game winning streak, two of which were resounding beatdowns. The team also picked up a close win on a neutral court against a solid squad from the Ohio Valley Conference on the second day of a back-to-back. Though this is a veteran squad, these experiences are always useful. Most importantly, Oakland is now 2-0 in conference play and ends the week with a huge win over UMKC. The team's confidence should be high heading into a week that features games against two of the Big Ten's best, Illinois and Michigan State.

Rarely A Letdown
Aside from Austin Peay, this week's games featured a slate of teams typically in the bottom fourth of Division I as measured by RPI. Over the past four years (or since the current senior class were freshmen), Oakland has done a great job of taking care of business against such teams, whether in conference or non-conference play and whether it's at home, away, or on a neutral court. One of the hallmarks of a great program is avoiding letdowns, and Oakland has proved that such letdowns are a true rarity. Since 2007-08, Oakland has played 33 games against teams that ended their seasons with an RPI ranking above 260, which is the bottom 25% of the rankings. In those 33 games, Oakland has a record of 30-3. In the first year of this study, 2007-08, Oakland went a perfect 8-0 against the worst teams in the conference:

Judging only by RPI, The Summit League was fairly strong as just four teams were above the benchmark. Oakland took care of all of those teams handily, the only close call coming via a one-point win at Frost Arena in Brookings, South Dakota. The following year, the same in which Oakland was one shot away from heading to the NCAA Tournament, the Golden Grizzlies dropped its only three games in this period of time:

Fans probably remember the 20-point loss at Centenary rather well as it was arguably one of OU's worst losses in recent memory. The losses to SUU and SDSU were on the road in tough places to play if not only for the travel involved in getting there. As we can see, though, generally Oakland's margin of victory increased as the RPI of the opponent increases. The same was largely the case last season:

Oakland's margin of victory at home was much higher than on the road, which is somewhat expected given the way the team has played at the O'Rena the last few years. The wins on the road - and they won all of them - offer a mix of close wins and sizable victories which tend to increase as RPI increases. This is a good indicator of a solid team, as the Golden Grizzlies surely were in 2009-10. What is perhaps most disheartening about this sample in particular is the size of it: five Summit League teams were in the bottom quarter of Division I last season. Yikes.

In non-conference games, Oakland has a perfect 6-0 mark against teams with RPIs of 260 or more, and only one of those wins was at the O'Rena. These games are important for Oakland to win considering Coach Greg Kampe schedules a lot of tougher opponents prior to Summit League play, so wins are usually few and far between.

Southern is included because there is a very strong likelihood that it will end the season with an RPI above 260. Austin Peay is probably safe from that distinction. Oakland will likely face either Eastern Michigan or Valparaiso at home on December 21. Both teams play in fairly strong mid-major conferences and should finish lower than 260, but there is a chance EMU could if it doesn't start winning some games. Other than that, Oakland's remaining games against such teams will come in conference play. Southern Utah is currently hovering right around 260, as is UMKC, the two teams Oakland beat this weekend. By season's end, you can bet The Summit League will have three to four teams in that range, so hopefully OU's history of winning these games will continue into conference play.

Keith Benson's 22/22/7/6
If Oakland fans ever see another statistical performance like that of Keith Benson's against Austin Peay, it'll likely come from the same player before he runs out of eligibility in March. To accomplish 20 and 20 is a sort of big man benchmark for greatness, but to do it while racking up 7 assists and 6 blocks is simply astounding. Using the efficiency measure from BBState.com, which essentially accounts for all of a player's box score stats in one number, Benson's APSU performance ranks 10th in the nation so far this season. He was one of only two players in that range to come anywhere close to quadruple-double discussion, and perhaps the only reason this performance doesn't rank higher is since the efficiency stat likes a lot of points. His 22 rebounds tie him for most in a game in 2010-11 with Syracuse's Rick Jackson. He is only one of two players along with Morehead State's Kenneth Faried to have a 20 and 20 night this season. Short of finding a game-by-game statistics database that sorts by position, I'd also be willing to bet his 7 assists are a high for centers this season. Wow.

Larry's One Best Way
Back in the early part of the 1900s, management theorist Frederick Taylor began to analyze work in a way that had not been done before. He would look at mundane tasks in an effort to determine the best way to accomplish work. He wrote a book about this around the idea of "scientific management," which would go on to inform business managers for the next 50 years on how to get their workers to do work in the "one best way" possible. Essentially, everyone had their duty in achieving maximum efficiency for the organization. The game of basketball utilizes the abilities of different players of varying talent levels to achieve one goal: wins. Presumably, every player has their own one best way of helping the team accomplish that goal. For Larry Wright, one could argue that his one best way has never been fully realized as a Golden Grizzly. He came here expected to be a scoring two-guard but struggled to find his shooting touch for much of the season. Now he's been asked to be a point guard for the first time in his career, a position which is he still learning. However, against Southern Utah on Thursday night, I think we finally saw Larry get closer to discovering his one best way.

At this point in time, I'm not sure I expect Larry Wright to ever knock down triples like he did when he was at Saint John's. While his role as PG has limited his number of attempts, he's still only made three all season. With that said, hopefully he'll score by doing what he did against SUU. In the chart above, we see that all four of Larry's field goals came as a result of his own penetration (beginning of the blue line indicates where he started, the circle indicates where the made shot was taken). One was a mid-range jumper that he connected on, but the other three all came in a high-percentage area of the court, created by his athleticism and ability to get to the basket. In the other two games where he was able to do this (Ohio and Wright State), he scored in double digits but also got to the free throw line quite a bit. If he's able to get in the lane like he was on Thursday - his one best way - those chances will increase, as will his shooting percentage and ability to help his team when taking shots. For Oakland to be successful, it may not need Wright to score in bunches (especially with the emergence of Hamilton), but four or five baskets a game like this would certainly go a long way to helping in addition to his distribution duties.

Drew Valentine's Conference Splash
Drew Valentine had a great opening to the conference season in games against Southern Utah and UMKC. The sophomore player is one who many expected to make a big leap this year, yet he struggled early on in the slew of road games. At home, however, Valentine kicked things up a notch to put together two very solid performances. Drew also had a monster dunk in each game. Kudos to Mr. Valentine.

Home Crowd
One of the benefits of having conference games in December is that it gives the team a 50% chance of having home games during a stretch of the season where most games are played on the road. The crowds at the O'Rena on Thursday and Saturday passed the eye-test, but how were they when compared to the last time OU hosted conference games during the first week of December?

Date ... Team ... Attendance
Dec 2007 ... Southern Utah ... 1,705
Dec 2010 ... Southern Utah ... 2,015
Dec 2007 ... UMKC ... 1,165
Dec 2010 ... UMKC ... 2,505

This offers us a pretty solid comparison considering the opposing teams were the same. It's great to see such a large jump in attendance figures from 2007 to 2010, especially for these early-season conference games. Props should also go to the student section which looked to be full despite the approaching finals week.

"Free Ilija" Watch
Ilija finally got some extended playing time in Oakland's rout of UMKC on Saturday where he compiled eight points and six rebounds in 20 minutes of action. The big man also knocked down a triple which both he and the crowd were visibly excited about. If he plays like that in other conference games, Oakland's bench will get a big lift.

Non-Keith Benson Stud Of The Week: Will Hudson
A weekly shoutout to the best Golden Grizzly not named Keith Benson.
Will Hudson has played admirably this season, but he was seemingly unstoppable at the Chicago Invitational, scoring 40 points and grabbing 23 rebounds. He came close to another double-double against Southern Utah with his 11 points and 8 boards. Finally, his presence in the post was a big reason why Oakland dominated UMKC so much. OU's guards were more active on the boards in this one, so Will The Thrill left his mark by scoring 17 points in 25 minutes. The senior forward is having a heckuva year.

Top Play Of The Week
Reggie Hamilton's bank shot triple to send the game against Austin Peay to overtime was the highlight of the season so far for the Golden Grizzlies.

What's Next?
Oakland gears up for its toughest stretch of the season, starting with a road game at Illinois against a stellar Fighting Illini squad. The team will come back to Michigan after that for a semi-home game at The Palace against the Michigan State Spartans. It's Big Ten week for the Golden Grizzlies.

Friday, December 3, 2010

Game Preview: Oakland vs. UMKC

Game 8: Oakland (1-0, 4-3) vs. UMKC (0-1, 4-2)
Saturday, December 2, 2010 | 6:00pm at the O'Rena
Watch: OU All-Access ($) | Radio: WXOU.org

Oakland continues its opening weekend of conference play at home on Saturday against the UMKC Kangaroos. The Golden Grizzlies picked up a convincing first win on Thursday against an improved Southern Utah team. UMKC traveled to Fort Wayne where the team battled IPFW into overtime but ultimately came up short.

The Rouse Of The Roos
If one just looked at their record, one might say that the UMKC Kangaroos are off to a nice start to the 2010-11 season. Look a bit deeper and we see that UMKC has benefited from a rather fluffy schedule thus far. Their three Division I wins have come against teams with RPIs of 275, 338, and 344. The RPIs of the teams that have beat UMKC are 42 (Wichita State) and 124 (IPFW). Credit should be given to UMKC for taking care of business against the lower-echelon of Division I, but we probably won't know much about this team until conference games begin in earnest. On Thursday, however, the Roos did their best to show that they're not going to be conference bottom-feeders by taking IPFW to overtime in Fort Wayne. The loss surely strings, but it's a good sign for the program. If there is a reason why Coach Matt Brown's team rises from it recent stupor, it's because he finally has some seniors to count on. While Jay Cousinard and Bakari Lewis started their careers elsewhere, their contributions as seniors have been solid. But it may be four-year UMKC player Spencer Johnson who has helped his team the most.

Statistical Similarities
Non-conference games might not provide the best sample for comparing teams statistically, but they can still paint a general picture of a team's tendencies. In juxtaposing several standard team stats for Oakland and UMKC, it's eerie how similarly the team's have started the season. They shoot about the same FG% and 3FG%, commit about the same number of turnovers, and have very close rebounding rates. Where the teams differ greatly are in statistical categories that benefit Oakland.
The table above charts defensive shooting percentages as well as some assists data. As far as the defensive side of the ball goes, Oakland is doing a great job of defending the paint and surrounding area, allowing opponents to shoot just 43.6% on two-pointers. UMKC, on the other hand, is allowing a whopping 50.7% to opponents. This benefits Oakland quite a bit due to the inside presence of Keith Benson and Will Hudson, not to mention Reggie Hamilton who has shown he can get to the basket for high-percentage buckets. As for assists, Oakland clearly has better ball movement as over 60% of the team's field goals result from an assist. UMKC's 38% rate is good for 339th in the nation. As we noted in our Southern Utah preview on Thursday, Oakland typically racks up assists while playing at home, and better ball movement is usually a sign that a team is playing well. Benefit: Oakland.

Key Personnel Match-Up
Travis Bader/Ledrick Eackles/Drew Valentine vs. Jay Cousinard
Aside from some of the big man match-ups, predicting personnel match-ups at the other positions has proven difficult this year. Oakland's backcourt has a lot of versatility and thus can switch between different kinds of guards, and given OU's lack of size on the wing, we've seen a combination of players guarding opposing small forwards. Heading into the season (after the injury of Blake Cushingberry), one of the chief concerns for the Golden Grizzlies was who would step up to be a big-time defender at the wing position, primarily in the conference where a lot of premier talent is concentrated here. Tonight against UMKC, Oakland gets that first test against Jay Cousinard, a 6'6" forward who leads his team in scoring and has been a conference player of the week already. Oakland's saving grace might be Drew Valentine, who played his best game of the season against Southern Utah. Hopefully Valentine can keep the momentum from Thursday in attempting to lock-down Cousinard, who is capable of being shutdown. I listened to the Roos game against Wichita State where he went 3 of 12 from the field, mostly due to WSU keying in on Cousinard and using a changing combination of players to defend him. If that's the case, then maybe Oakland's combo of Travis Bader, Ledrick Eackles, and Drew Valentine can stay fresh enough to handle Cousinard in steady doses.

UMKC Player To Watch: Spencer Johnson
Spencer Johnson is having somewhat of a revival season for UMKC in what is his final year as a Kangaroo. After an impressive sophomore campaign, Johnson didn't inflict the same kind of damage as a junior when all of his performance numbers dropped considerably. Through six games this season, Johnson is playing like it's two years ago, shooting over 50% from the field for about 12 points a game to go along with 8.7 rebounds. Johnson can also stretch defenses with his ability to knock down the occasional shot from beyond the arc, making him player a for which preparing is tough. It's also worth noting that while Cousinard may get more attention, Johnson has been the more efficient player (a measure of a player's total impact) with an average of 15.3, which puts him only behind Keith Benson, ORU's Dominique Morrison, and Will Hudson for most efficient players in the conference. That's some good company.

Oakland Player To Watch: Drew Valentine
Can Drew put together a second consecutive good game for the Golden Grizzlies? We sure hope so. Valentine had a very complete game against Southern Utah, most notably marked by his 7 assists to just 1 turnover. The sophomore also finally started to connect from downtown, which gives OU an additional threat on the perimeter when needed. Here's to hoping the home court will continue to boost Valentine's confidence on what is still a very young season.

History
This is a series that used to go back-and-forth quite a bit prior to 2007. Since the conference tournament that year, Oakland has won eight straight against the Kangaroos, including three at the O'Rena by an average margin of about 12 points.

Bullet Points
  • Where is Kirk Korver? The Oakland student section's favorite UMKC player hasn't logged any minutes yet this season for the Roos, much to our wonderment. We've done our fair share of digging to figure out where the sophomore has been to no avail. Even though his team features more productive players, Korver is still an interesting person to keep an eye on. If he's injured, we wish him a speedy recovery.
  • Reggie Chamberlain has been a bit of an impact player for Matt Brown in his first season with UMKC. After sitting out last season due to transferring from Wichita State, the guard has contributed 10.7 points per game, including 20 on 4-0 three-point shooting when UMKC visited his former team at the beginning of the week. The emergence of this Reggie probably means they won't be missing the other Reggie. Speaking of which...
  • Oakland fans are probably well aware that Reggie Hamilton transferred to Oakland from UMKC, a team he left in the middle of his second season. Hamilton was a productive player while he wore a blue and yellow uniform, something he has replicated early in his time in the black and gold. Transferring inside of the conference is a bold move for both the player and the school accepting that player, but fortunately Reggie will be in an arena where he's loved. We'll see how he does against his old team.
The Extra Pass
Typically we'll use this section to add any neat things we find on the Internet about the opposing team, whether it's from a traditional media outlet or from a college basketball blogger or whatever else pops up. This is a fairly easy task for non-conference games against bigger-name opponents who get a lot of ink, both printed and digital. When Summit League games begin, we're reminded of the harsh reality that most of these schools face as minor blips in otherwise major media markets. UMKC might be the hardest hit of conference schools as it is in a fertile college basketball area that is dominated by coverage of Kansas, Kansas State, and Missouri. The Kansas City Star has written a total of one feature article on UMKC since the season started, a brief preview of the team. Moreover, the university's student newspaper has all but one minor blip about the basketball team since the season began (at least on its website). UMKC does not have a fan blog and its fan message board suffers from weak participation. This is not a condemnation of UMKC by any means, but simply something we as Oakland fans should think about so as not to take for granted the coverage we are provided. As a fan blog, we know our role and that's to offer whatever analysis and goofy animated .gifs we can to help drum up some fan interest on the web. But as a community of fans, we're fortunate to have some dedicated people covering the team at the games and using their access to inform us about the daily ongoings of the team, led by Paul Kampe of The Oakland Press and continued admirably by the student reporters of The Oakland Post. As an example, if one of Oakland's players were not playing, you can be sure we'd all know why (in reference to Kirk Korver). As we just finished the Thanksgiving season, it's a great time to be thankful for the coverage Oakland gets because it's far from the norm in The Summit League.

Other Conference Games On Thursday
Centenary at WIU (8:30pm) - The Gents hung with IUPUI, will be be easier in Macomb??
SUU at IPFW (7:30pm) - IPFW had a scare at home against UMKC. Must beat SUU.
Oral Roberts at IUPUI (7:00pm) - Our first chance to see if IUPUI is a contender or a pretender in the conference this season. ORU is playing really, really well right now.
NDSU at SDSU (8:30pm) - The biggest game of conference play for now. SDSU hasn't beaten NDSU in about a million games. Can the Jacks stay perfect?

As always, if you're interested in getting in on the conversation with other Oakland fans before, during, and after the game, we highly suggest checking out the Golden Grizzly Hoops forum: Game Thread.

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Game Preview: Oakland vs. Southern Utah

Game 7: Oakland (0-0, 3-3) vs. Southern Utah (0-0, 2-4)
Thursday, December 2, 2010 | 7:00pm at the O'Rena
Watch: OU All-Access ($) | Radio: WXOU.org

Oakland opens up conference play on Thursday night by hosting Southern Utah at the O'Rena. The game is OU's first home game all season and it comes on the heels of a two game win streak which saw the Golden Grizzlies thoroughly dismantle an opponent (Southern) and gut it out against another (Austin Peay). Back in Rochester and presumably well-rested, Oakland gets a Southern Utah team making its longest conference road trip of the season. SUU has just two wins on the season, one to DI independent Bakersfield and another over Great West member Houston Baptist. The Thunderbirds have had trouble putting points on the board, something which will surely prove difficult if the Grizzlies are defending like they have been lately. However, this is a conference game where every second counts and teams typically have a renewed sense of hope surrounding the league championship race, so the T-birds won't be lamenting over their losses.

Conference Games In Early December?
This is the fourth year now where Summit League play has started with two games in early December. It's also the third of the four where Oakland has faced the Southern Utah and UMKC combo (and second time at home). Interestingly, Oakland is 0-2 against Southern Utah in these games. While the merits of conference games at this point in the season can be debated, the simple fact remains that they are a reality right now in The Summit League, so the teams have to do the best they can to prepare for them like it's January. When your team is the home team, it comes as good news for fans since home games in November and December are often few and far between. Oakland fans know this well as the match with Southern Utah is the first home game of the season. Students are still in session, albeit getting ready for finals, and we're far enough from the holidays that the community at large shouldn't have too many distractions this weekend. Hopefully that combination will result in big home crowds for both the SUU and UMKC games over the next two days.

Assist Inflation
While the assist may seem like a pretty cut-and-dry statistic, there is actually some judgment involved on the part of the game statistician in how it is rewarded. One way of testing this is through the use of assist percentages (assists/field goals made) for teams when at home versus on the road. I got the idea to try this out for The Summit League after reading a great piece by Basketball Prospectus and was somewhat relieved to see that there are no incredible disparities in A/FM between home and away games in the conference. The rates, shown in the table above for the complete 2009-10 season, are all generally in a range that could be explained by simple things like better ball movement at home than on the road (or in the case of ORU, NDSU, and Centenary, a proclivity to distribute better on the road). The most interesting cases, though, were Oakland and Southern Utah. Both teams see a double-digit drop in assist percentages away from their homecourts. Is this explained by an assist-happy home statistician, a tendency to forget to pass the ball on the road, or something else? Now that we know about this difference, it'll be interesting to track assist percentages in their two matches this year.

Key Personnel Match-Up
Reggie Hamilton vs. Ray Jones, Jr.
With each additional game, Reggie Hamilton continues to win over the Oakland faithful with his three-point shooting, ability to get to the basket, and some of the dimes he has been dropping to his teammates. As Coach Kampe noted in a recent interview, one of Hamilton's strengths is his confidence in himself, which on one hand gives OU the kind of edgy player it needs in tough battles and on on other can cause Grizzly fans great pains when he jacks up a bad three here and there. Fortunately, the good has outweighed the bad, and now it is time to see what Hamilton can do as he re-enters Summit League play since his days in a UMKC uniform. As is always the case with this backcourt, it's tough to predict exactly who will guard who, but Ray Jones, Jr. seems like a candidate in this game. Although he's a junior, he's a new commodity for SUU and has had his fair share of ups and downs so far, but he gets to the line quite a bit and is his team's leading assists man at the moment. Like Reggie, Ray probably needs to limit his turnovers a bit, but otherwise has been a steady contributor for Roger Reid. This will be a good chance to see two junior guards establish themselves in Summit play.

Southern Utah Player To Watch: Matt Massey
Even though he had what most would characterize as an up-and-down first year as a Thunderbird, I really grew to like Matt Massey after seeing him in the O'Rena last year. He's a guy I thought would step in this year (he's a junior) and give SUU the spark it needed after Davis Baker graduated. His averages are up this season, but it has only been recently that Massey has really stepped up his game. He had 20 points in a win over Houston Baptist on 10 of 16 shooting, which might be the most shots he's had as a T-bird. If Massey can evolve into the scoring threat that he can be, SUU stands to have a much better season than it would otherwise. Even though he's not entirely a back-to-the-basket player, at 6'9" one would like to see Massey get to the free-throw line a bit more (he had zero FT attempts in that 20-point effort). Either way, the Australian will get a good test against Oakland.

Oakland Player To Watch: Will Hudson
Why not? Will Hudson played out of his mind in Chicago, pouring in 40 points and grabbing 23 rebounds, 12 of which were on the offensive end. I think most Oakland fans expected Will The Thrill to have a solid senior season, but 20-point nights were probably not what they had in mind. Hudson is a guy who is always lauded for that things he does without the ball, yet perhaps now more than ever he deserves the ball. SUU's frontline includes two tall guys in Aussies Matt Hodgson and Matt Massey. If Oakland enters the game like it did against Purdue, then expect Benson to stay near the basket guarding Hodgson and Hudson spending some time on Massey. Massey's a fairly skinny dude who can do quite a bit with the ball in his hands, but Hudson will likely be the toughest opponent he has played against in recent games. Further, Hudson should be able to use his big frame to out-rebound the SUU bigs in the paint. This has the look of game where Will could really shine, yet again.

History
It's the first of what will be the final four games between Oakland and Southern Utah while the Thunderbirds ride out their Summit League membership (the team will join the Big Sky in 2012). SUU has always been a team that has given OU trouble in conference games, though the Golden Grizzlies have won three straight dating back to the 2008-09 season. SUU last won at the O'Rena in 2007 by a final score of 82-73.

Bullet Points
  • On Monday, Coach Greg Kampe took to the WXOU airwaves to answer a number of questions from cohosts Matt Pocket and Bryan Everson. It was great to hear Kampe talk about his defensive philosophy for this season and why at times it may appear like Oakland is giving up a lot of threes. Essentially, he noted that the team's gameplan is to force opposing teams to take their chances with the three-ball because OU has Benson and Hudson to protect the area near the basket (where teams are shooting just 43.6%). In some of the early games, teams have simply knocked down those three-point shots, often even with hands in their faces. The team currently ranks seventh in the conference in 3FG% allowed, but if the statistics don't lie, then that number should come down even more after the SUU game. Southern Utah is currently shooting 21.1% from deep, good for last in the league and 344 out of 347 in the nation. Now if the T-Birds get hot from beyond the arc at the O'Rena, then maybe we keep wondering about Oakland's three-point defense. But those chances are slim.
  • Another statistical area to keep an eye on for this match-up is that of possessions. Oakland is currently the fastest teams in the league in terms of pace, running with 73.8 possessions per 40 minutes. Southern Utah, on the other hand, checks in at just 67.3. SUU may come in an try to control the tempo, but Oakland can get out and run if necessary, especially if SUU coughs the ball up as much as it has this season (which also applies to Oakland given its tendency for turnovers).
  • If there were an opponent blog for Southern Utah, you can be sure I'd ask the T-Bird faithful about Matt Hodgson. This is a 6'11" guy who had a promising freshman season by shooting over 58% from the field and blocking 2.2 shots per game. This year, those categories are down considerably, as is Hodgson's playing time. Hodgy gets in foul trouble rather easily (he's already fouled out in 50% of SUU's games), which probably explains his lack of minutes, but one has to think Coach Roger Reid had higher hopes for this big man in his second campaign. For SUU's sake, he better be careful with those fouls against Oakland.
The Extra Pass
Some kindred spirits are officially launching a project entitled The Half-court Press, which is a gameday newsletter that aims to print for every home game (or set of home games when they're of the Thursday-Saturday variety). The effort is a collaborative one that features many current students at Oakland who will be doing their best to write brief satirical articles about the opponents for home games. You can check them out online here, where PDFs of the newsletter should appear. Otherwise, I believe students can find a printed copy somewhere prior to the game (or perhaps more correctly, the HcP overlords will find you). This whole thing is very reminiscent of Utah State's The Refraction, which is one of the best student section newsletters I have ever seen. We wish The Half-court Press the best of luck in gathering interest from students. Every little bit to make the student body more informed on OU basketball goes a long way toward keeping student interest strong!

Other Conference Games On Thursday
Centenary at IUPUI (7:00pm) - Can Centenary get over the hump for its first win?
UMKC at IPFW (7:00pm) - The home team always wins in this series.
Oral Roberts at Western Illinois (9:00pm) - WIU goes for its second straight win over ORU after beating the Golden Eagles for the first time since 2006 last February in Tulsa.

As always, if you're interested in getting in on the conversation with other Oakland fans before, during, and after the game, we highly suggest checking out the Golden Grizzly Hoops forum: Game Thread.